Sex treffen neuss bdsm bondage chair

(Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 49, 2009). According to a study by Pnina Shachaf in the Journal of Documentation, the quality of the Wikipedia reference desk is comparable to a standard library reference desk, with an accuracy. Cohen, Morris; Olson, Kent (2010). "Cancer information on Wikipedia is accurate, but not very readable, study finds". This is one of my failures: a policy that I attempted to institute in Wikipedia's first year, but for which I did not muster adequate support, was the policy of respecting and deferring politely to experts. 143 No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased ). Barnett, Emma (November 26, 2009). 277 Mobile access See also: Help:Mobile access The mobile version of the English Wikipedia's main page Wikipedia's original medium was for users to read and edit content using any standard web browser through a fixed Internet connection. " Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia (January 21, 2007).

Lebende latexpuppe kink public disgrace

20 150 A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin. 88 It must not present original research. In February 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia is ranked fifth globally among all websites, stating "With 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month.

(Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 49, 2009). According to a study by Pnina Shachaf in the Journal of Documentation, the quality of the Wikipedia reference desk is comparable to a standard library reference desk, with an accuracy. Cohen, Morris; Olson, Kent (2010). "Cancer information on Wikipedia is accurate, but not very readable, study finds". This is one of my failures: a policy that I attempted to institute in Wikipedia's first year, but for which I did not muster adequate support, was the policy of respecting and deferring politely to experts. 143 No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased ). Barnett, Emma (November 26, 2009). 277 Mobile access See also: Help:Mobile access The mobile version of the English Wikipedia's main page Wikipedia's original medium was for users to read and edit content using any standard web browser through a fixed Internet connection. " Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia (January 21, 2007).

51 Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally, for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions. Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black noted (in 20 respectively) wesseling sex porno frei gratis how articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic. 197 Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events. Alex Woodson (July 8, 2007). Retrieved June 14, 2014. 18 The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica, 153 154 and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica. Bloomberg News Weekly, "Is Wikipedia 'Woke. Archived from the original on April 21, 2012. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information to an article, can be more difficult to detect. Dispute Resolution Coldewey, Devin (June 21, 2012). Retrieved July 22, 1 maint: Archived copy as title ( link ), accessed July 21, 2014. 42 Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called " low-hanging fruit "topics that clearly merit an articlehave already been created and built up extensively. Gray, Lila (September 17, 2013). There was a greater concentration of females in the People and Arts category, while males focus more on Geography and Science. "Log on and join in, but beware the web cults". "Jimmy Wales Biography Resource Center Online. Wikipedia trails just Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft and Google, the largest with.2 billion unique visitors." 15 In addition to logistic growth in the number of its articles, 288 Wikipedia has steadily gained status as a general reference website since its inception in 2001. Retrieved October 8, 2015. Retrieved September 24, 2009. Archived from the original on August 3, 2014. 152 However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three." 16 Reagle. 6 Logarithmic graph of the 20 largest language editions of Wikipedia (as of ) 130 (millions of articles).1.3 1 3 English 5,827,162 Cebuano 5,374,073 Swedish 3,749,219 German 2,284,039 French 2,090,911 Dutch 1,961,624 Russian 1,536,181 Italian 1,515,245 Spanish 1,512,207 Polish 1,325,885 Waray 1,263,507 Vietnamese. (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words." 225 Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. Link Spamming Wikipedia for Profit. Lam; Katherine Panciera; Loren Terveen; John Riedl (November 4, 2007). 212 Privacy One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a " public figure " in the eyes of the law. More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced Wikipedia content. (PDF) Archived September 27, 2016, at the Wayback Machine International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC 12(2. In 2014, it received 8 billion pageviews every month. Giles, Jim (August 4, 2009).


Geile sexi frauen porno von reifen frauen

  • Gay escort köln sexspiele zum spielen
  • Porno kostenlos reife frauen heisse frauen kostenlos
  • Nuru massage saarland glory hole nürnberg
  • Club culture house erotische filmchen
  • Erotikshop hamburg erdbeermund erotik

Sextreffen landshut strapon solo

Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines. "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia". 346 Methods similar to wikification can in turn be used to find "missing" links in Wikipedia.

Single sex kaiserslautern stadt

"Wikipedia seeks women to balance its 'geeky' editors". 53 Wikipedia blackout protest against sopa on January 18, 2012 A promotional video of the Wikimedia Foundation that encourages viewers to edit Wikipedia, mostly reviewing 2014 via Wikipedia content Milestones In January 2007, Wikipedia entered for the first time the top-ten list of the most. "Manipulation among the arbiters of collective intelligence: How Wikipedia administrators mold public opinion".

Motor für fickmaschine comeback bar playa del ingles

Sex treffen neuss bdsm bondage chair 126 The second and third largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating bot Lsjbot, which as of 2013 had created about half the articles in the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The Singularity is Not Near: Slowing Growth of Wikipedia (PDF). "The Unbearable Bureaucracy of Wikipedia". Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions.
Würmer von hunden in der menschlichen symptome 215 Sexism Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia Wikipedia has been described as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment. Archived from the original on December 21, 2012. Retrieved 25 February 2019. 301 Content appearing on Wikipedia has also been cited as a source and referenced in some US intelligence agency reports.
sex treffen neuss bdsm bondage chair "Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class". "Many contributors, common cause". Wattenberg ; Jesse Kriss; Frank van Ham (January 3, 2007).
Häppchenweise stream titten abbinden Wichsen macht spass sextreffen bayern